Interpopulation variability and assessment of competitiveness of Erigeron canadensis L. in various biotopes of the secondary distribution range
https://doi.org/10.35102/cbg.2025.28.40.002
Abstract
Invasive plant species are an excellent model for studying rapid microevolutionary changes occurring in a secondary range. The model species, Erigeron canadensis L. (Asteraceae), began actively naturalizing in Russia at the beginning of the 19th century and is now one of the three most widespread invasive species. The aim of this study is to assess the inter-population variability of E. canadensis across a broad range of soil and climatic conditions and to identify the factors explaining the rapid evolution of this species' competitive abilities over at least two hundred generations. Forty six 1 × 1 m sample plots were established in different habitat types across Moscow, Moscow Region, and the Tula, Kursk, Oryol, Belgorod, Vladimir, Nizhny Novgorod, and Amur Regions, as well as the Perm and Stavropol Territories. For each plot, a list of all encountered species was compiled, and the tallest specimen of E. canadensis was selected. For this specimen, the length of the vegetative and generative parts of the shoot and the number of capitula were determined. Subsequently, the above-ground parts of all plants within a 0,5 × 0,5 m accounting plot around the tallest specimen were cut, and the air-dry biomass was assessed for: the tallest specimen of E. canadensis, all other specimens of E. canadensis, and all accompanying species growing within the plot. Very high inter-population variability of phenotypic traits was noted: the coefficient of variation for dry above-ground biomass exceeded 94 %, and for the number of capitula, it exceeded 95 %, indicating the high adaptive potential of the species. A strong positive correlation was revealed between the number of capitula and the plant's above-ground biomass. It was concluded that in its secondary range, E. canadensis has undergone strong directional selection and is capable of growing in diverse ecotopes, which explains its high phenotypic variability. Erigeron canadensis is an explerent with low competitive ability, and its presence affects natural phytocenoses only to a minor degree: some competitive effect was observed only on 13 % of the plots, where the biomass of E. canadensis was higher than the biomass of all other accompanying species. No stable plant groupings of E. canadensis with other species were found in any of the ecotopes it has colonized. Most species growing together with E. canadensis were encountered only sporadically, which contradicts the "Global competition" and "Invasional meltdown" hypotheses, which posit that initially established alien species "facilitate" the invasion of other alien species into the phytocenosis. A general conclusion was made that the global success of the E. canadensis invasion was facilitated by high seed productivity combined with phenotypic plasticity and a high rate of microevolution in the secondary range.
About the Authors
Yu. K. VinogradovaRussian Federation
Moscow
A. G. Kuklina
Russian Federation
Moscow
M. A. Galkina
Russian Federation
Moscow
O. V. Kotenko
Russian Federation
Blagoveshchensk
References
1. Abhilasha D., Joshi J. 2009. Enhanced fitness due to higher fecundity, increased defence against a specialist and tolerance towards a generalist herbivore in an invasive annual plant. Journal of Plant Ecology. 2(2): 77-86. DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rtp008
2. Aschehoug E.T., Brooker R., Atwater D.Z., Maron J.L., Callaway R.M. 2016. The mechanisms and consequences of interspecific competition among plants. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 47(1): 263-281. DOI: 10.11146/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032123
3. Colautti R.I., Grigorovich I.A., MacIsaac H.J. 2006. Propagule pressure: A null model for biological invasions. Biological Invasions. 8: 1023–1037. DOI: 10.1007/s1053-0-005-3735-y
4. Galkina M.A., Zelenkova V.N., Kurskoy A.Yu., Tretyakov M.Yu., Tokhtar V.K., Vinogradova Yu.K. 2022. Polymorphism of Erigeron canadensis L. along the Trans-Siberian Railway. Ecosystem transformation. 5(3): 76-83 (In Russian)
5. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). Erigeron canadensis. [online] Available at: https://www.gbif.org/species/3146791. (Аccessed on: 05.01.2024).
6. Hammer Ø., Harper D.A.T., Ryan P.D. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1): 9.
7. Har-Edom O.L., Sternberg M. 2010. Invasive species and climate change: Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronquist as a tool for assessing the invasibility of natural plant communities along an aridity gradient. Biological Invasions. 12: 1953-1960. DOI: 10.1007/s10530-009-9640-z
8. Hegi G. 1979. Illustrierte Flora von Mittel-Europa. Compositae 1. Band VI. Teil 3. Berlin-Hamburg: Paul Parey. 366 s.
9. Lambdon P.W., Pyšek P., Basnou C., Hejda M., Arianoutsou M., Essl F., Jarošík V. et al. 2008. Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs. Preslia. 80 (2): 101–149.
10. Levine J.M. 2001. Local interactions, dispersal, and native and exotic plant diversity along a California stream. Oikos. 95 (3): 397-408. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.200.950304.x
11. Levine J.M., D’Antonio C.M. 1999. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invisibility. Oikos. 87(1): 15-26. DOI: 10.2307/3546992
12. Lucas M.S., Hensen I., Barratt C.D., Callaway R.M., Durka W., Lekberg Y., Nagy D.U., Onstein R.E., Shah M.A., van Dam N.M., Thoma A.E., Rosche C. 2024. Re-focusing sampling, design and experimental methods to assess rapid evolution by non-native plant species. Biological Invasions. 26: 1327-1343. DOI: 10.1007/s10530-024-03249-x
13. Mayorov S.R., Vinogradova Y.K. 2024. Introduction to plant invasive biology. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press. 165 p. (In Russian)
14. Morozova O.V., Vinogradova Yu.K. 2018. 21. Erigeron canadensis L., 1753 Small-finned Canadian (Canadian fleabane). The most dangerous invasive species of Russia (Top 100) / Ed. Dgebuadze Yu.Y., Petrosyan V.G., Khlyap L.A. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press. P. 137-141 (In Russian)
15. Ricciardi A., Maclsaac H.J. 2000. Recent mass invasion of the North American Great Lakes by PontoCaspian species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 15 (2): 62-65.
16. Rosche C., Hensen I., Schaar A., Zehra U., Jasieniuk M., Callaway R.M., Khasa D.P., et al. 2019. Climate outweighs native vs. nonnative range-effects for genetics and common garden performance of a cosmopolitan weed. Ecological Monographs. 89(4): e01386. DOI: 0.1002/ecm.1386
17. Senator S.A., Vinogradova Yu.K. 2023. Invasive plants of Russia: results of inventory, peculiarities of distribution, and management issues. Biology Bulletin Reviews. 13(6): 681–690 DOI: 10.1134/S2079086423060130
18. Simberloff D., Holle B.V. 1999. Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: Invasional meltdown? Biological Invasions. 1, 21–32.
19. Vinogradova Yu.K. 2005. Experimental study of invasive populations of Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronquist. Bulletin of the Main Botanic Garden. 189: 53-76. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Vinogradova Yu.K., Kuklina A.G., Galkina M.A., Kotenko O.V. Interpopulation variability and assessment of competitiveness of Erigeron canadensis L. in various biotopes of the secondary distribution range. New Bull. MBG. 2025;1(1-2):24-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35102/cbg.2025.28.40.002